Skip to main content

God and Bush's Right

Link: Daily Show. As Jon says, "Have pride in a government that allows for such a peaceful non-transfer of power." (Seriously, does it make any sense to have an inauguration for a second term?) The Freedom 27 - Liberty 15 final score that Hamlet refers to was part of the show yesterday, where Jon commented: "It was a noble effort by Liberty, which as you know has been playing hurt since the PATRIOT Act." If the result of Bush's rhetoric is a foreign policy that promotes liberty throughout the world, this is a vital mission. Given the success of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (BTW, Yushchenko's inauguration is this Sunday! Link.) we need to ramp up support of democratic / libertarian movements everywhere. I wish Bush had spoken out more openly about Ukraine than he did. I hope that he will speak out more in the future, when it comes to movements in other countries. My hope is that we will create the greatest diplomatic push in history to carry out this mission. My fear is that we will continue to carry out this mission primarily using the military, which is not in accord with the spirit of liberty. Bush's speech suggests that all countries that have regimes who do not support liberty are legitimate targets. This is a wholly un-pragmatic position and cannot be made to work - as Peggy Noonan said, it was "over the top." Link. When Bush encouraged the young to engage in service, the image that leaped into my mind was of military service, not volunteerism. I also fear that, as we have done in Iraq, we will use the rhetoric of liberty as a smokescreen to accomplish our military-industrial-geopolitical goals. This will create greater suspicion of the US in the world, not greater trust. Maybe the election in Iraq will prove me wrong. Maybe the Sunnis will boycott and there will be a civil war. In any case, if this speech is an indicator as to how we will deal with the developing nuclear crises in Iran and North Korea, things look grim. One-party rule is undemocratic enough, but dynastic rule is approaching monarchism. Maybe we should just crown the Bushes and stop pretending we don't have a monarchy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Valid Path

Last weekend I completed ripping my Alan Parsons CD collection and started listening to it at work off my portable media player. While listening, I figured I might as well google Alan, maybe there would be some interesting historical stuff on the web. As it turns out, Alan Parsons is still kicking and has a new album out! Even better, he's doing electronica now! I'll be receiving it shortly and will do a review. This will be the first record without his long-time bandmates Ian Bairnson, and Stuart Elliott. The new album will take Alan in a new direction and into the world of electronica. Artists appearing on this record include: Nortec Collective, The Crystal Method, Shpongle, PJ Olsson, and Pink Floyd's David Gilmour.

US death toll in Iraq tops 1,000

Senator Kerry calls this a "tragic milestone," and the most catastrophic of the administration's mistakes made so far. Regardless of his mistakenly voting for the war at the time, he's right. For him to turn against the Iraq war is a flip-flop I would be happy with. Hopefully he has an exit strategy, even though he's not telling us about it at the moment. This is why Bush must be defeated in November. I realize the economy is an important issue, but compared to 1000++ dead soldiers? Come on. Not to mention 7,000++ wounded, and the 11,000++ estimated by the Iraq Body Count . This is a slam dunk, as George Tenet would say. Prediction: if Bush is [re]elected, the U.S. will engage in pre-emptive war against Iran and/or North Korea. Is that really what we want?

And What Happens When I Don't Wait Well?

I guess you get anxious ... and we all know what that’s like. But I think that “ yakhal ” (Hebrew) or " elpis " (Greek) does not preclude the possibility of action - whether it’s writing about the situation, or something more (and don't underestimate the power of journaling!) Indeed, you don't think of prophets or apostles as the kind of people to sit around just waiting for something to happen. They act, but their action is tempered by the realization that things don’t look too good at the moment (otherwise why would the issue even be coming up?) So they act and wait at the same time, knowing that the fruits of their action are ultimately dependent on the Lord. And of course the Lord is known to have us do things for a while before any kind of clear result is made known. Like planting, and then watering, and then waiting, for a seed to turn into a plant. Farmers probably understand waiting a lot better than we do. They think in seasons and years, not months or we...